Family Communication Patterns of Female Civil Servants within Bureaucratic Work Culture and Digital Transformation
Keywords:
Bureaucratic Culture, Digital Transformation, Family Communication, Female Civil ServantsAbstract
Women constitute the majority of Indonesia's civil service, yet institutional reforms rarely account for how bureaucratic and digital work regimes reshape family life. Female civil servants especially mothers are more and more becoming victims of stiff hierarchical culture and digital demands that cut across their official working hours, posing serious queries regarding the effect of the same on their family communication. Based on Family Communication Patterns Theory and work-family boundary theory, this study is a critical analysis of the impact of bureaucratic work culture and digital transformation on family communication pattern of women civil servants who have teenage children, an aspect that has been under-researched in the field of family communication studies. Through qualitative case study method, the research included 18 women civil servants aged between 35 and 50 years old from different provinces in Indonesia. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews, online focus group discussions, and digital observation, and analyzed thematically through source triangulation. Findings reveal that although family communication appears open, it is deeply constrained by bureaucratic norms and digital labor expectations that blur work–family boundaries and intensify maternal role strain. Five main family communication patterns were identified, namely Bureaucratic Spillover, Communication, Always-On Maternal Communication, Negotiated Openness, Temporal Conflict Cycles, and Adaptive Independence Socialization, showing adaptive but unequally coping strategies. The study underscores the urgent need for family-sensitive bureaucratic reforms and critically questions the sustainability of digital governance practices that rely on gendered, invisible family labor.
References
Abendroth, A.-K., van der Lippe, T., & Treas, J. (2024). Digital communication in work and family life in Europe. Community, Work & Family, 27(5), 565–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2024.2422443
Abramczuk, K., Kopacz, A., Górska, G., & Mielczarek, M. (2025). Balancing acts: Work–family conflict and polychronicity preferences when working from home during a crisis. Safety Science, 192, 106983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106983
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002
Ahmad, & SR, N. (2025). Transformasi komunikasi keluarga di era media sosial antara kehangatan dan tantangan privasi digital. Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 17(1).
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3363315
Badan Kepegawaian Negara. (2024). Buku statistik Aparatur Sipil Negara semester I tahun 2024. Badan Kepegawaian Negara.
Badrolhisam, N. I., & Jamil, R. (2025). Gender flexible work arrangements: A global bibliometric analysis with a focus on Asian content. Future Business Journal, 11, 114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00519-5
Batubara, F. R., Alya, J. M., Hasibuan, E. A., Berlianti, B., Lubis, A. S., & Sitepu, A. S. (2025). Dinamika Sosial Keluarga di Era Digital: Studi tentang Pola Komunikasi antara Orang Tua dan Remaja. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Informatika dan Komunikasi, 5(1), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.55606/juitik.v5i1.1080
Bernhardt, J., & Recksiedler, C. (2022). Work-to-family conflict and parenting practices: Examining the role of working from home among lone and partnered working mothers. Journal of Family Research, 34(4), 1072–1100. https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-709
Blau, P. M., & Meyer, M. W. (1993). Bureaucracy in modern society. McGraw-Hill.
Boullion, A. M., Linde-Krieger, L. B., Doan, S. N., & Yates, T. M. (2023). Parental warmth, adolescent emotion regulation, and adolescents’ mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1216502
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
Breshears, D., & Rabe, M. (2025). Contextualizing family communication in South Africa. Journal of Family Communication, 25(4), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2025.2545876
Chung, H. (2020). Gender, flexibility stigma and the perceived negative consequences of flexible working in the UK. Social Indicators Research, 151, 521–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2036-7
Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700536001
Craig, L., & Churchill, B. (2021). Dual-earner parent couples’ work and care during COVID-19. Gender, Work & Organization, 28, 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12497
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design. SAGE Publications.
Daminger, A. (2019). The cognitive dimension of household labor. American Sociological Review, 84(4), 609–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419859007
Dean, L., Churchill, B., & Ruppanner, L. (2022). The mental load: Building a deeper theoretical understanding of how cognitive and emotional labor overload women and mothers. Community, Work & Family, 25(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2020.1868445
Franken, S. (2021). Frauen im digitalen Zeitalter: Neue Chancen vs. alte Stereotype (hal. 209–229). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34497-9_13
Gittell, J. H., & Douglass, A. (2012). Relational bureaucracy: Structuring reciprocal relationships into roles. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 709–733. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0438
Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092933
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.
Gusman, S. W. (2024). Development of the Indonesian government’s digital transformation. Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v5i5
Halim, D., & Zahratul Husna, U. (2023). Pola komunikasi dalam organisasi Digital Transformation Office saat pandemi dan setelah pandemi di Team Operational. Jurnal Penelitian Inovatif, 3(2), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.54082/jupin.161
Hochschild, A. R. (2012). The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. Penguin Publishing Group.
Hosain, M. S. (2025). The dilemma of work-family balance for the dual-career couples with child/children: Qualitative evidence from Bangladesh based on family systems theory. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 33(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-11-2023-4096
Hu, Y., & Qian, Y. (2024). Gendering digital labor: Work and family digital communication across 29 countries. Community, Work & Family, 27(5), 588–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2024.2373852
İnan, K., & Kara, B. (2023). Yerel yönetimlerde dijital hizmetlerin dönüşümünde kadının rolü: Niğde Belediyesi örneği. Uluslararası Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.59182/tudad.1329303
Işık, T. (2021). Emniyet teşkilatında görev yapan kadın polislerin cinsiyetleri bağlamında farklı rollerdeki iletişim süreçlerinin incelenmesi: Ağrı İl Emniyet Müdürlüğünde bir uygulama. Asya Studies, 5(15), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.31455/asya.901890
Kadir, A., Wirawan, H., Salam, R., & Zahra, N. S. (2024). Working mothers in Indonesian public organizations: Investigating the effect of work-family conflict on positive discipline parenting via well-being. Journal of Applied Social Science, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/19367244231196782
Koerner, F. A., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2002). Understanding family communication patterns and family functioning: The roles of conversation orientation and conformity orientation. Annals of the International Communication Association, 26(1), 36–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2002.11679010
Kreiner, G. E. (2006). Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: A person-environment fit perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.386
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24(5), 1337–1357. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0806
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
OECD. (2023). Digital government review of Indonesia: Towards a digital government strategy. OECD Publishing.
Reid, E. (2015). Embracing, passing, revealing, and the ideal worker image: How people navigate expected and experienced professional identities. Organization Science, 26(4), 997–1017. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.0975
Sohal, A., Sharma, D., & Sharma, S. (2025). Work–family conflict: A systematic literature review and research agenda. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2025.10.002
Weeks, A. C., & Ruppanner, L. (2025). A typology of US parents’ mental loads: Core and episodic cognitive labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 87(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.13057
Williams, J. C., Blair-Loy, M., & Berdahl, J. L. (2013). Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12012
Williamson, S., Taylor, H., & Weeratunga, V. (2024). Working from home during COVID-19: What does this mean for the ideal worker norm? Gender, Work & Organization, 31(2), 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13081
Yang, H. M., & Kim, H. R. (2021). Work–family conflict on children’s internet addiction: Role of parenting styles in Korean working mother. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115774
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.
Zanhour, M., & Sumpter, D. M. (2022). The entrenchment of the ideal worker norm during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from working mothers in the United States. Gender, Work & Organization. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12885
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1970 Zalfa Qathrunnada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication of the work, simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
