Peran Media Masa Inggris dan Jerman dalam Menginformasikan Pandemi COVID-19

Authors

  • Rizky Anggraini Universitas Indonesia
  • Henny Saptatia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38194/jurkom.v4i1.201

Keywords:

Media massa, Inggris, Jerman, Krisis kesehatan, COVID-19

Abstract

The emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic in various parts of the world has provided speculation and news that takes care of public spaces including Mass Media in Britain and Germany. The role of the Internet and the mainstream press media cannot answer in terms of disseminating information about COVID-19 to the public. This research examines how the British and German Mass Media reported the spread of COVID-19 and about how the mass media played a role in reporting on the health crisis that occurred in the two countries. The object of research chosen was the online news platform in the form of British and German mainstream media, each of which had a different character. This study aims to understand the role of the media in coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic health crisis, the theory used in this study is the framework and theory of social media responsibility. So it can be seen to what extent the media has played a role in providing information about the health crisis that occurred in the two countries.

References

Abraham, T. (2007). Twenty-First Century Plague: The Story of SARS. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Andersson, G., Lundstrom, T., Bernier, A., Bjornstrom, E. E. S., Kaufman, R. L., Peterson, R. D., Slater, M. D., Chiricos, T., Eschholz, S., Dixon, T. L., Azocar, C. L., Casas, M., Dorfman, L., Dorfman, L., Schiraldi, V., Schiraldi, V., Esbensen, F.-A., Tusinski, K., Goodman, S., … Petley, J. (2002). McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. Youth & Society, 28(1), 498–523.
Dominick, J. R. (2009). The dynamics of mass communication: Media in the digital age. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Entman, R (2007) Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication 57: 163–173.
Entman, R .(1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58.
Fletcher, R., & Jenkins, J. (2019). Polarisation and the news media in Europe | Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (Issue March). https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/polarisation-and-news-media-europe
Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
Leach, M., & Dry, S. (2010). Epidemics: Science, governance, and social justice. In Epidemics: Science, Governance and Social Justice (Issue June). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849776424
Mahase, E. (2020). Covid-19: UK starts social distancing after new model points to 260?000 potential deaths. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 368(March), m1089. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1089
Okunna, C. S. & Omenugha, K. A. (2012). Introduction to mass communication (3rd ed.). Enugu: New Generation Books.
Pieri, E. (2019). Media Framing and the Threat of Global Pandemics: The Ebola Crisis in UK Media and Policy Response. Sociological Research Online, 24(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418811966
Siebert, Fred. S; Theodore, Peterson; Schramm, Wilbur. (1963). Four Theories of The Press: The Authotarian, Libertarian, Social Responsibility, and Soviet Communist Concept of What the Press Should Be and Do. Chicago: University of Illinois Press
Stafford, N. (2020). Covid-19: Why Germany’s case fatality rate seems so low. The BMJ, 369(April), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1395
World Health Organization. (2020). Covid-19 Situation Report. World Health Organization, 31(2), 61–66.
Zhou, W., Wang, A., Xia, F., Xiao, Y., & Tang, S. (2020). Effects of media reporting on mitigating spread of COVID-19 in the early phase of the outbreak. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 17(3), 2693–2707. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2020147

Downloads

Published

2021-02-19

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Februari 2021

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication of the work, simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).