Analisis Jaringan Wacana pada Pembentukan UUTPKS di Media Daring

  • Evvy Silalahi Universitas Indonesia


This study aims to explore the construction of the TPKS Bill (Draft Law on the Elimination of Sexual Violence) into the TPKS Law (Act of Sexual Violence) through discourse debates in online mass media and the actors involved in the discourse battle. Many obstacles were faced related to the formulation of the material from the TPKS Bill. The theory used is the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) with the discourse network analysis method. The unit of analysis is digital text from online mass media, the sample is 109 statements sourced from 26 news articles. The results of the study show that in the process of making the TPKS Law there was a coalition of parties that supported and opposed, generally more who supported the UUTPKS being ratified, while there were three political parties who opposed it.


Aryani, A. R. (2021). Analisis Polemik Pengesahan RUU Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual ( TPKS ). Najwa: Jurnal Muslimah Dan Studi Gender, 1(1), 30–49.
Béland, D., & Howlett, M. (2016). The role and impact of the multiple-streams approach in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 18(3), 221.
Bossner, F., & Nagel, M. (2020). Discourse networks and dual screening: Analyzing soles, content and motivations in political twitter conversations. Politics and Governance, 8(2), 311–325.
Brandes, U., & Wagner, D. (2004). Visone: Analysis and visualization of social networks. In ( J. & P. M. (Ed.), Graph drawing software (pp. 321–340). Springer Nature.
Brugger, H., & Henry, A. D. (2021). Influence of policy discourse networks on local energy transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 39(April), 141–154.
Bruno Latour. (2005). Reassembling The Social : An Introduction to Actor Network Theory. Oxford University Press Inc.
Buckton, C. H., Fergie, G., Leifeld, P., & Hilton, S. (2019). A discourse network analysis of UK newspaper coverage of the “sugar tax” debate before and after the announcement of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1–14.
Budiman, A. (2021). Dorong RUU PKS Segera Disahkan, KSP Siapkan Gugus Tugas Lintas Kementerian.
Cairney, P. (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Public Policy and Administration (M. L. and E. C. P. STEVEN J. BALLA (ed.); 1st ed., p. The Handbook of Classic in Public Policy and Admin). Oxford University Press.
Castells, M. (2015). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Chaterine. (2021). Perubahan Draf RUU PKS Dinilai Bisa Lemahkan Substansi Utama.
CNNIndonesia. (2021). Daftar Pasal RUU PKS yang Hilang Usai Diubah Jadi RUU TPKS.
Eriyanto. (2022). Analisis Jejaring Wacana: Konsep, Metode, dan Aplikasi untuk Penelitian Ilmu Komunikasi, Politik, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya.
Eriyanto, & Ali, D. J. (2020). Discourse network of a public issue debate: A study on covid-19 cases in indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(3), 209–227.
Ghinoi, S., S., & B. (2020). The Political Debate on Climate Change in Italy: A Discourse Network Analysis. Politics and Governance, Volume 8(2), 215-228.
Ghinoi, S., Wesz Junior, V. J., & Piras, S. (2018). Political debates and agricultural policies: Discourse coalitions behind the creation of Brazil’s Pronaf. Land Use Policy, 76(April), 68–80.
Grunig, J. . (2009). Paradigms of global public relations in an age of digitalisation. Prism, 6(2), 1–19.
Hajer, M. (2005). Coalitions, Practices, and Meaning in Environmental Politics: From Acid Rain to BSE. In David Howarth & Jocob Torfing (Ed.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance (1 st, pp. 297–315). Palgrave Macmillan.
Hajer, M. A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford University Press.
Hajer, M. A. (2002). Discourse analysis and the study of policy making. European Political Science, 2(1), 61–65.
Heclo, H. (1987). Issue network and The Excecutive Establisment. The New American Political Syste. American Entrprise Institute.
Iqbal. (2021). RUU PKS Ganti Nama Jadi RUU TPKS, Ini pertimbangan Panja DPR.
Irianto, S. (2021). Relasi Kuasa dan Kekerasan Seksual di Lingkungan Kampus. Jurnal Perempuan, 26(2), 135–141.
Jovani, A. (2021). Perempuan dan Kebijakan Publik: Urgensi RUU Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual. Jurnal Inada, November 2020, 1–13.
Komala, R. (2022). Jejaring Wacana Pada Debat Kebijakan Publik : Studi Discourse Network Analysis (DNA) Pada Isu Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Komisi I DPR RI. Universitas Indonesia.
Komnas Perempuan. (2022). Komnas Perempuan.
Kurniawan, T., & Derajat, A. Z. (2022). Peran Legislator Perempuan Dalam Mengawal Pengesahan Ruu Tpks. Jurnal Harkat : Media Komunikasi Gender, 18(2), 1–16.
Leifeld, P. (2016). Discourse Network Analysis: Policy Debates as Dynamic Networks. The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks, July 2016, 301–325.
Leifeld, P., & Haunss, S. (2010). A Comparison between Political Claims Analysis and Discourse Network Analysis: The Case of Software Patents in the European Union. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Leifeld, P., & Haunss, S. (2012). Political discourse networks and the conflict over software patents in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 51(3), 382–409.
Lesmana,A. , Sari, R. (2021). Nasib RUU TPKS di DPR: Diwarnai Kepentingan Elektoral Hingga Pandangan Konservatif.
Makdori, Y. (2021). pks-usulkan-frasa-norma-agama-masuk-ke-dalam-ruu-pks.
Marres, N., & Rogers, R. (2008). Subsuming the ground: How local realities of the Fergana Valley, the Narmada Dams and the BTC pipeline are put to use on the Web. Economy and Society, 37(2), 251–281.
McCulloh, Ian, H. A. anf A. J. (2013). Social Network Analysis with Application. Wiley.
Nagel, M., & Satoh, K. (2019). Protesting iconic megaprojects. A discourse network analysis of the evolution of the conflict over Stuttgart 21. Urban Studies, 56(8), 1681–1700.
Permana, R. (2021). Judul RUU PKS Diganti, Draf Baru Hanya Akui 4 Jenis Kekerasan Seksual.
Reckhow & Stange. (2018). Financing the education policy discourse: philanthropic funders as entrepreneurs in policy networks. Springer Nature.
Sabatier, P. ., & Smith, H. C. J. (1999). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 117–166). Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2–3), 129–168.
Sabatier, P. A., & Smith, H. C. J.-. (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2007). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovations and Clarifications. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process. West Press.
Scott, J. (2017). Social Network Analysis (S. Publications (ed.); fourth).
Sihombing, R. F. (2021). Ketua Panja Jelaskan Alasan RUU PKS Tak Kunjung Tuntas tapi Malah Ganti Nama.
Simon Lindgren. (2017). Digital Media & Society (1st ed.). Sage Publication Inc.
Tambunsaribu, R. D., & Widiantini, I. (2021). Ranah Personal yang Politis dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Penghapusan Kekerasan Seksual di Indonesia. Jurnal Perempuan, 26(2), 79–90.
Utami, S. (2021). RUU PKS Dinilai Harus Berdasar pada Pancasila.
Yesicha, C., Faruk, F., & Wahyono, S. B. (2022). Reality the Truth of Religious Practice in Documentary Covid-19. 377–387.